Low perception of social enterprises

The public is unaware of what social enterprises are, according to survey findings. This signals that more needs to be done.

By ELEANOR YAP

The public’s awareness of social enterprises like ProAge are low, according to survey findings. The social enterprise focuses on creating avenues and opportunities for people to age well.

The public is unaware of what a social enterprise is, according to a public perception survey commissioned by the Social Enterprise (SE) Associationand announced yesterday. Only 13 percent of the 2,000 respondents surveyed knew what social enterprises are. Of those who knew confused social enterprises with non-profits and voluntary welfare organisations, and even statutory boards like SPRING Singapore.

Of those who bought products and services from social enterprises, the survey found that many bought greeting cards, and painting and handicraft items, and 91 percent were satisfied with their purchases. The reason given on why they bought from the social enterprises was because of the social cause that the social enterprise stands for, as well as the quality, price and need for the product or service, which are reasons why the public would buy from a regular business.

Shared Teo Mee Hong, executive director of SE Association: “It is a business decision for social entrepreneurs on whether or not. Those who highlight the social cause include businesses like Eighteen Chefs (who employs ex-convicts), Professor Brawn Cafe (who employs people of different abilities, ages and socio-economic backgrounds) and Joan Bowen Café (who employs young adults with special needs).” On the flip side, there is also Laksania, explained Teo, who employs marginalised groups in its central kitchen but “does not want sympathy votes”.

 

Potential market to tap on

The survey also found that even though there is a potential market for social enterprises, of which some 55 percent have yet to be engaged, social enterprises have to be aware of some stumbling blocks. For one, businessmen are considered to be “non-buyers”. Explained Teo, “We can only guess that maybe businessmen believe that the social cause element in a social enterprise is being used as a marketing gimmick.”

On where the public would like to see social enterprises market their products, the buyers as well as the non-buyers recommend that the products be sold at retail outlets such as Robinsons and Tangs. In terms of the communication channels that social enterprises should market on to spread their efforts, the survey found the preferred avenues are broadcast media, followed by print media, the Internet and word-of-mouth.

 

No surprise 

These findings was no surprise for the social enterprises. Said Isaiah Chng, director of ProAge, a social enterprise that focuses on creating avenues and opportunities for people to age well, said: “I am not surprised by the survey’s results as everywhere I go, no one seems to know what a social enterprise is. Even in the social enterprise arena, we are not sure what constitutes a social enterprise until recently [when clear definitions came out earlier this year], so we shouldn’t expect the public to know.

“I do tell people I am a social enterprise but it is not in their face. We need to get our social initiatives to gain traction first and then use that as our advantage. Right now, we want to latch on to the business advantages and the value that our services provide. That is really what a social enterprise is about – it is business first or else you won’t be able to push the cause.”

Tommy Tng, general manager, sales and operations for Ability Enterprise, shared he too was not surprised by the findings. He represents a social enterprise, which runs an employment programme (see right) under the charity, Society for the Physically Disabled (SPD) that offers services including designing and making greeting cards, bookbinding and making corporate gifts. “There is still a lot of room for improvement on publicity particularly on social enterprises. There is a lot more effort on our part to create this awareness of our products and services.”

Currently, the SPD Ability Enterprise uses social media like Facebook, SPD’s quarterly newsletter, direct mailers and Web advertisements to publicise its efforts. “However, we are only doing a fraction of what we can achieve and we will be ramping up our marketing efforts. Instead of people coming to us, we need to reach out to them. We also rely on networking at events and participating at trade fairs.”

Moving forward, SE Association’s Teo shared: “With the findings, we wanted to clarify the objectives of social enterprises and that they should champion a social mission and support the employment of the marginalised people. But, they should be a profit-making business. In terms of publicity, we will be working with the Ministry to create greater awareness for social enterprises. We want to highlight the outstanding features of social enterprises.”

She advised social enterprises to behave like a regular business and decide whether they want to use their social cause as a differentiation from a regular business. “[As seen in the findings], they need to know the public is open to supporting their social cause.”

 

This article was first published in SALT

The long, hard journey of social enterprises

BT 20120505 TLSOCENT3NVUO 1283707

SOCIALLY SPEAKING
Ms Chng of Bettr Barista (above) and Dr Keng with the IDeaf-Connect team both believe that the government should look to countries where the SE sector is more developed and learn from them

SOCIAL entrepreneurship seems to be catching on of late, with more Singaporean entrepreneurs setting up businesses that care about more than just profits. But it’s no cushy ride for start-ups with second or third bottom lines.

One important issue is that while awareness is increasing, the man in the street still does not know the difference between a social enterprise (SE) and a charity. According to a survey commissioned by the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports (MCYS) in 2010, 87 per cent of those polled did not know what an SE was. Of those who did know, slightly less than half thought that the objective of an SE was to raise donations, instead of applying business strategies to achieve social, cultural or environmental goals.

That is why Richardo Chua, founder of four-year-old Adrenalin Events and Education, is grateful for the President’s Challenge Social Enterprise Award that was established in March to raise awareness of SEs and encourage growth in the sector.

He believes that because the President’s Challenge is a national platform and is social-enterprise-centric, the awards will raise awareness for the industry as a whole and provide scrutiny and credibility to SEs.

This article was first published in The Business Times 

S R Nathan appointed chairman of CapitaLand charity arm

Former president S R Nathan has been appointed as the new chairman of the CapitaLand Hope Foundation, the philanthropic arm of CapitaLand Limited.He is taking over from former chairman Lim Chin Beng, who is retiring.

His first task as chairman was to visit the Jamiyah Children’s Home, a key beneficiary of the foundation.

Local news reports said Mr Nathan took part in a tree-planting ceremony in the new ‘CapitaLand Garden of Hope’ together with Mr Haji Abdul Karim Maidin, President of Jamiyah Singapore, and Mr Liew Mun Leong, President and CEO of CapitaLand Group.

Mr Nathan also presented the home with a $40,000 cheque, which goes towards the creation of the ‘CapitaLand Garden of Hope’.

The 50-metre-square garden aims to develop the childrens’ interest in nature by letting them grow their own produce for consumption.

The money will also help furnish the dormitories of the home’s new premises with new beds and cupboards.

The Straits Times reported that Jamiyah Children’s Home has moved from its old premises, a one-storey building at Chin Cheng Avenue, to its current location at Guillemard Crescent.

The childrens’ new home, which can take in 110 residents, is a four-storey building complete with facilities like a basketball court, futsal field and a fruit and vegetable garden.

This article was first published in Asiaone

Good food for a good cause

 

In 2002, following the business dictum, “Invest in what you know”, three young teachers set up a tuition centre called School of Thought. They focused on General Paper, English and Literature, for which there is the lucrative subjects for which there is unending demand by Singaporean students.

Then, a unit below their office on North Bridge Centre opened up for rent. Says one of the founding directors, Shiao-Yin Kuik, “We knew there would be traffic and we then joked about starting a restaurant. The more we joked, the more serious we became about setting up a restaurant.”

Kuik adds, “We always knew we were more than just a tuition centre. A restaurant would make a public statement that we were not just that. A restaurant would also serve as a neutral place to tell others about the causes we believe in.”

The three friends had always believed that book learning was not enough. They felt their students should get to know about global and local issues such as poverty, human rights and medical ethics. The trio were already channeling some of the profits from their school into a special fund to subsidise tuition for students from disadvantaged families.

After much conversation, Kuik’s two other directors agreed that a restaurant

would be the way to go. “We had no experience with the restaurant business and we knew the attrition rate. But as good teachers, we believed we could do it and we approached it in the same way we would advise our students to – research and plan,” says Kuik.

Serving up some food for thought

They seized the opportunity and opened their North Bridge Road outlet in 2007. The tiny café is directly opposite the National Library building, and has a friendly, bohemian air. It specializes in freshly-made gourmet salads and sandwiches, as well as delicious homemade cake.

This year, it was time for second helpings. The partners launched a bigger and more upmarket concept within the Singapore Art Museum on Queen Street. Their new bistro serves an all-day breakfast, as well as Asian fusion dishes like crispy curry chicken and spicy chilli fries, Szechuan pepper roast beef, and hoisin har cheong baby back ribs.

It was their tuition centre that provided inspiration for the name of their restaurants which they called Food For Thought. Kuik explains that they funded the second outlet with money from the tuition centre, as well as a bank loan. “If you play it safe, you don’t test your limits. You need to once in a while, take a leap of faith.”

The world on a plate

As diners enjoy the freshly-cooked food dished up by the resident chefs, they can read literature and displays on community issues affecting Singapore and the world. By simply enjoying a meal they are contributing to five different causes, including fair education, protecting the environment and encouraging kind acts. Staff tips and salary support nine children adopted on a World Vision plan.

Global issues become clear with a simple glass of water. The menu invites a voluntary donation to Living Water International, a US based organisation provides clean water to those in need in countries like Kenya, Angola, India and Sierra Leone; “For every $2 you donate to enjoy a free flow of water at Food For Thought, you will bless one African for one year with that same privilege.”

High-quality, socially conscious products are available for purchase from the Queen Street restaurant, and the money goes to a scholarship fund for East Timorese children. To encourage kind acts, the restaurant runs competitions such as a photography competition about the clean water crisis, and events such as a book swap where secondhand books are re-packaged in a “pre-loved” collection and sold to benefit the needy.

Once again, Kuik and her two cohorts relied on research as well as the personal touch when it came to choosing the causes to support. A good reputation was important too, as in the case of World Vision. “We go down and meet the organisation. Other organisations we choose by faith as well as track record.”

As a teacher, and as a social entrepreneur, Kuik and her partners feel it’s vital to practice what they preach. When asked about their motivation behind their giving, she said, “In our tuition centre, we teach the kids that those who have more, need to help those who have less. We have to live up to what we say in the classroom.”…

For more information, please visit www.foodforthought.com.sg

This article was first published in SALT